tigerlily said:
Thanks tigerlily
bekyboo44 said:
I also think your labeling of posts as 'bitchy,' to be out of order. But I guess we all respond to that label differently.
Perhaps in ?bitchy? my choice of adjective was poor, might you suggest an alternative? To help, here?s the context; I am a new and concerned participant on this forum. I posted a question with genuine worry at a time when a conversation with a doctor was not possible, and received this reply : ?I don't even know you and your post annoyed me.?
Considering this is a forum where users can CHOOSE not to post or read, I arrived at ?Bitchy? as a suitable description of the post. Just consider that one could respond to every single post on this board with ?I don?t even know you and your post annoyed me? ? and in my opinion doing so is just bitchy. Feel free to show me the light.
bekyboo44 said:
We are just a bunch of sleep deprived mothers, what do we know?....... Personally, also, I've found your posts slightly patronising (but then again I am another sleep deprived Mother).
Please understand that I did not introduce the issue of sleep deprivation into this thread. While it may not be your intention, your post seems to indicate just that.
nicolejoy said:
I do think that husbands and wives need to work together and listen to each others concerns and all that... I'm currently 31 weeks pregnant and my husband is a bit more "cautious" than me - and so we've talked about things that he would prefer me to not do when I'm pregnant and I try to respect that
I really do believe this is the way to a wonderful marriage and am really happy you chose to join this thread. My wife and I have the same arrangement, but of course from time to time we do disagree about things that are assumed and perhaps not clarified, as happened with the peanut issue.
Of course the whole ?argument? is over now. My wife and I have agreed together that it is not worth the potential risk to our child to eat peanuts. They?re peanuts, who cares?
nicolejoy said:
For me, sushi was one of those things that I didn't want to give up ?????..but then in the second and third trimester, I have been eating it occasionally - but only in places where I know it's good quality and so I'm minimising the possible risks.
We had a similar discussion but decided to go the other way. Perhaps if this was Japan instead of HK it would have been different. Could you perhaps let us know which places you consider ?good quality??
neha said:
If u speak to the DR infront of your Wife that will lead to some more fights.
Thanks neha. Actually my wife would have no problem with that. What we had was hardly a fight, let me explain:
Me: <grabs some peanuts>
Her: hey gimme some
Me: are you supposed to be eating these?
Her: well I have been eating them, whats the big deal?
Me: I thought they could give baby allergies and stuff
Her: I ate them at <1st babies> time and she?s fine
Me: yeah but that could just be luck, shouldn?t we err on the side of caution, just in case?
Her: I don?t wanna talk about this anymore
Me: <takes the peanuts away> - <posts on geobaby>
We talked it out and like nicolejoy said, she is great enough to respect the fact that husbands should have a say too. I know this forum has its fair share of militant ?this is my body? mothers, and good luck to them. Personally, these deals work both ways, which is why I don?t skydive, smoke (anymore), or drink the water in Mexico ? amongst many other things. I have a responsibility to my wife and kids, and my wife has EQUAL responsibility to her husband and kids. Pretty fair I think. The less enlightened may find it annoying, YMMV
mel_g20 said:
I have a child just diagnosed with a peanut allergy, and no history of allergies in my family. However I ate alot of peanuts in my first pregnancy.
Really sorry to hear that. I do hope he/she outgrows it. Thank you for your kind words, I need all the positive vibes I can get in this sea of hostility. God bless your little one.
leahH said:
Wow, you really like to make life hard for yourself..
Simply find out from a medial professional specialising in allergies IF peanuts are an issue in your wife's specific situation.
I posted past 11pm on Sunday night. I spoke to a doctor this morning. I was posting in the hope that someone could reply with specific and definitive information. It is now obvious that such information does not exist. I was attempting to make life easier for myself, in no way was I expecting to make my life any harder.
leahH said:
In most cases where there is a degree of known risk (let's say blue cheese and listeria) most women make a judgement call based on the medical evidence
I think the key word here is ?women?. In our case, we make judgment calls as a couple.
leahH said:
You don't have a 'known' risk - just a possible or perceived risk that could effect some people, nor do you have investigation into your wife's existing allergies.
I think this is the first time in this thread that someone has categorically stated that there is no known risk to unborn babies for mothers to eat peanuts. However, our doctor says otherwise.
Please do not assume we ?do not have investigation into <my> wifes existing allergies?. We have investigation, we do not have RESULT. It is an unknown. In my opinion that is not a license to throw caution to the wind, it is quite the opposite.
This morning our doctor and an allergy specialist (who conducted the last series of tests) separately confirmed that in the case of peanuts it would be better to stay away from them. Both of them indicated that we did not have to hunt out ?peanut content? on menus and in grocery stores, but eating plain peanuts ?straight up? could wait for a few months. This was advise given in light of my wifes current allergies to entities unknown.
leahH said:
Internet research is all well and good, but not a replacement for a medical degree - especially in sensitive situations such as this -e.g. involving the woman you love going through one of the most highly charged, hormonal, emotional, physically and mentally demanding phases in her life.
Frankly, you are entitled to ask questions and be concerned for your unborn child, but if my husband posted something similar to this I would be horrified.
I have said before and I will say again, I have a lot of sympathy and respect for the condition. I also do not expect any objectivity in this forum. However, I am compelled to state simply that there is NO EXCUSE for taking risks with unborn children. No matter how hormonal or ?sleep deprived? one is, these are not excuses for poor decision making.
I would think it a huge failure on MY part, given my wifes condition, to not make sure the I?s were dotted and t?s were crossed.
I understand that all marriages are different. But for one to be ?horrified? for one?s husband to voice concern over decisions one has made in one?s ?highly charged, hormonal, emotional?..? state ? well that makes a lot of sense. Nobody likes to be second guessed, but when there is a third person involved, we all have to do it, including fathers.