beccadeaton
Registered User
I have been in contact with our insurance company (based in the USA) to find out what coverage I have for pre-natal care and L&D so that I can make decisions about a doctor and hospital.
I found out that they will cover all my costs for any OBGYN. Moreover, the hospitals that they will agree to work with include Matlida and Canossa. This means that they will cover the costs with the exception of our standard deductible (what we would pay if we were in the US).
So my dilemma is this. My last baby was born 6 weeks early at 34 weeks (in the USA). He didn't have major problems, but he did spend 2 weeks in the neonatal intensive care unit. Although his problems were minor, it could have been worse, of course! My OBGYN in the states told me later that I would be at higher risk of having another premie with my next baby. So, I basically have the choice of going to Matilda, which obviously is lovely but does not have a NICU or going to Queen Mary, which is obviously less "nice" but has a NICU on site. Which would you choose under the circumstances?
Thanks for your input!
I found out that they will cover all my costs for any OBGYN. Moreover, the hospitals that they will agree to work with include Matlida and Canossa. This means that they will cover the costs with the exception of our standard deductible (what we would pay if we were in the US).
So my dilemma is this. My last baby was born 6 weeks early at 34 weeks (in the USA). He didn't have major problems, but he did spend 2 weeks in the neonatal intensive care unit. Although his problems were minor, it could have been worse, of course! My OBGYN in the states told me later that I would be at higher risk of having another premie with my next baby. So, I basically have the choice of going to Matilda, which obviously is lovely but does not have a NICU or going to Queen Mary, which is obviously less "nice" but has a NICU on site. Which would you choose under the circumstances?
Thanks for your input!