VanillaCafe
Registered User
Are these interviews really as ridiculous as I think they are? How does one judge a child's potential with an interview when they are as young as 2 or 3? I've been asking this questions to all the schools I visited, mostly the answer is we are looking for happy, social, easy-going kids.
Well, I can see Obama and Bill Clinton are probably happy and social kids when they were 3. But what about the many other people who've made tremendous contribution to the society? Let's imagine if Einstein, Hemingway, even Bill Gates were born in Hong Kong and they had to pass interview to be admitted to schools, do you think they'll be admitted to the most sought-after schools here?
I do hope that I probably don't know the whole picture, that the interviews are more sophisticated than they appear, that they do have certain ways to scientifically identify a child's potential.
Can anyone help shed light on this? Especially if you've worked at the schools here and know the inside scoop.
Well, I can see Obama and Bill Clinton are probably happy and social kids when they were 3. But what about the many other people who've made tremendous contribution to the society? Let's imagine if Einstein, Hemingway, even Bill Gates were born in Hong Kong and they had to pass interview to be admitted to schools, do you think they'll be admitted to the most sought-after schools here?
I do hope that I probably don't know the whole picture, that the interviews are more sophisticated than they appear, that they do have certain ways to scientifically identify a child's potential.
Can anyone help shed light on this? Especially if you've worked at the schools here and know the inside scoop.