'Local' schools have K1 K2 and K3 starting around 3. Then P1-6, the F1-7. (I think!). This is usually also the case with the DSS (Direct Subsidy Schools) schools.
The local system is in the middle of a big change in its further education. It is changing from a 3-4-3 system to a 3-3-4 system.
3-4-3 is:
- three years F1 to F3 (year 7 to year 9 in ESF and grades 6 to 8 in the USA)
- four years for university entrance F4 to F7 (year 10 to year 13 in ESF and high year in the USA - but some are only three years)
- three years in university or college
- three years F1 to F3 (year 7 to year 9 in ESF and grades 6 to 8 in the USA)
- three years for university entrance
- Four years for university
A number of my children's friends are doing all sorts of strange things building up to this change. One is taking her IGCSEs in F4 instead of F5 but will still be taking the HKCEE in F5. Another is now studying medicine at HKU but she joined early after F6 and never finished her A levels or studied F7.
These changes may make it much harder to get into British universities which are still working on a 3-4-3.
As for a child 'hating' a subject - each to his own. But the failure to study one's own native language to matriculation is probably one factor in the overwhelming illiteracy amongst university students. Even maths students have to complete project and research based work - hard to do if your writing skills are rudimentary.
It is fine to talk about this is general terms but when you have to deal with individual children the fact that a child hates one subject and loves another could easily be the difference between dropping out and continuing in education. Not everyone can be good at all subjects.
In England it is considered having your native language for university entrance if you pass your GCSE in it at age 16 - they don't insist that you have to study it for another two years.
To fully compare the systems it is important to compare levels for each exam level. I don't know much about the comparison of English and other languages but in the mathematics the level my son learnt in the British system at 16 was very similar to the level my daughter was studying in the Canadian system at 18!
As each child is an individual and their strengths and weaknesses become more apparent as they age I believe it is important to be flexible and make changes to schooling as necessary. This could easily mean that one system that suits at age 5 is no longer the best solution by age 16.
The other thing to remember is that the systems themselves change over time. 15 years old A levels were thought to be a very good qualification to get into university - now many people give the impression they aren't worth the paper they are written on and that the IB is much better. What will be the thinking in another 15 years when the children starting school now are making university choices?
Last edited: