I am now 38 week pregnancy and this is my first child. My doctor has recommended a C-section to me and the reason she gives to me is that my baby has not been engaged by now. She also told me that for first pregnancy if bb is not engaged by week 38, the chances of bb being engaged around the due date is very low. She also said that the non-engagement also signals a CPD (meaning the size of the head of the bb is bigger than the size of my pelvis) although she is not sure whether I actually have a CPD until I have tried V delievery and failed.
However I have heard of cases where some babies are not engaged till moms are in labor (I am talking about first pregnancy here).
I personally prefer a vaginal dilievery over C-section and my bb is of a normal size (3.1kg based on ultrasound by the end of week 37). I am now at a loss and also very confused after my doctor told me the above things.
I would like to ask the following questions:
1. has anyone's doctor recommended C-section for same reason?
2.also, my doctor says that if I decide to go for a C-section based on her recommendations, I should do it during the week 38 rather than around the due date. I asked why and she said that it is "international practice". Has anyone heard of such international practice before?
many thanks
However I have heard of cases where some babies are not engaged till moms are in labor (I am talking about first pregnancy here).
I personally prefer a vaginal dilievery over C-section and my bb is of a normal size (3.1kg based on ultrasound by the end of week 37). I am now at a loss and also very confused after my doctor told me the above things.
I would like to ask the following questions:
1. has anyone's doctor recommended C-section for same reason?
2.also, my doctor says that if I decide to go for a C-section based on her recommendations, I should do it during the week 38 rather than around the due date. I asked why and she said that it is "international practice". Has anyone heard of such international practice before?
many thanks