He has a reputation as being great at C-sections but I am currently seeing him and can say that he is not pro c-section at all. I had to have a c-section with my second and now pregnant with my third child he was quite adamnant that as long as they didn't need to induce me I could have a vbac.
I think he is completely pro-choice if anything. The fact that he has a reputation for leaving women with tiny c-section scars probably means that women that want a c-section gravitate towards him thus increasing his ratio of c-vaginal births. Make sense?